The aim of the study was to compare the straining forces applied when sitting or squatting during defecation. Twenty-eight apparently healthy volunteers (ages 17-66 years) with normal bowel function were asked to use a digital timer to record the net time needed for sensation of satisfactory emptying while defecating in three alternative positions: sitting on a standard-sized toilet seat (41-42 cm high), sitting on a lower toilet seat (31-32 cm high), and squatting. They were also asked to note their subjective impression of the intensity of the defecation effort. Six consecutive bowel movements were recorded in each position. Both the time needed for sensation of satisfactory bowel emptying and the degree of subjectively assessed straining in the squatting position were reduced sharply in all volunteers compared with both sitting positions (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, the present study confirmed that sensation of satisfactory bowel emptying in sitting defecation posture necessitates excessive expulsive effort compared to the squatting posture.
The author intends to analyze cultural shifts in consumer behavior towards kitchen devices, examining the fleeting allure and eventual redundancy of “miracle” appliances.
The New Yorker provides credible, culturally informed analyses, grounding this piece in its longstanding reputation for thoughtful journalism and cultural commentary.
Squatting during defecation reduces straining compared to sitting.
Adopting the squatting position may help prevent health issues related to excessive straining.
Defecation Posture, Straining, Squatting, Sitting, Human Health